W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > January 2019

Re: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638)

From: Nicholas Car via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 01:08:11 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-452932052-1547082490-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Some of the early examples I've made use Pattern 1 but others, since the addition of `prof:hasArtifact` to the ontology use the N-Ary relation Pattern 2. 

I agree that from a modelling perspective, Pattern 2 is the better one as it doesn't lock the artifact into anything (properties that might, through inference or more info lead to clashes). 

Unless there are objections, I'll redo all examples like this, since I have to update them all anyway.

GitHub Notification of comment by nicholascar
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/638#issuecomment-452932052 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2019 01:08:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 April 2019 13:45:05 UTC