Re: ACTION on ALL - FPWDs

We are not required to have a group identifier -it was a suggestion by Dave but one that no one in the voting on namespaces favoured.

If we go by the votes, this is resolved for the simple /ns/prof/. Also, the slash URI, which was the form voted for, is my and Rob’s preferred form and has recent precedence with the SOSA and SSN ontologies using it.

Nick

Nicholas Car
Senior Experimental Scientist
CSIRO Land & Water
E nicholas.car@csiro.au<mailto:nicholas.car@csiro.au> M 0477 560 177<tel:0477%20560%20177> P 07 3833 5632
Dutton Park, QLD, Australia

On 17 Nov 2018, at 4:31 am, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net<mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net>> wrote:

I am reminded by Dave Raggett that the /ns/ namespace requires a group
identifier level to avoid name collisions. He recommends that we use
/ns/dx/, so a namespace for the profiles ontology would be:

https://www.w3.org/ns/dx/prof


Note that the namespace for DCAT is:

http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#


We can have the slash vs hash discussion since there is no need for prof
to follow the dcat example.

Would it be possible to put off the final decision for this for the
future, or do folks feel a need to resolve this for the FPWD of prof?

kc

On 11/15/18 8:29 AM, Karen Coyle wrote:
Here's the last email in the thread, AFAI can determine:

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2018Nov/0286.html


For the documents, that gives:

https://www.w3.org/TR/prof

https://www.w3.org/TR/prof-guidance

https://www.w3.org/TR/prof-conneg


For the RDF/OWL namespace(s), so far we have:

http(s)://www.w3.org/ns/prof<http://www.w3.org/ns/prof>/<http://www.w3.org/ns/prof/>

I will put on the agenda to vote on these at the next meeting, although
I know that the editors need an answer immediately. Therefore, if
necessary please use these short names in the documents knowing that
they could be changed (and anyone who has objections MUST reply to this
email ASAP).

kc

On 11/13/18 3:06 PM, Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park) wrote:
It wasn't actually addressed in the meeting but I agree Andrea is representing the mailing list consensus.

Nick


On 14/11/18, 8:59 am, "andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu<mailto:andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu>" <andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu<mailto:andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu>> wrote:

   Dear Karen, all,

   I may have missed it, but it is unclear to me which is the final decision about the URLs for PROF and PROF-CONNEG.

   Based on the discussion on the mailing list, my understanding is that there's a kind of agreement for

   https://www.w3.org/TR/prof


   and

   https://www.w3.org/TR/prof-conneg


   respectively.

   Is this correct? If this is the case, please note that PROF-CONNEG still has

   https://www.w3.org/TR/conneg-by-ap


   (see https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/conneg-by-ap).

   I'm going to create a PR to fix this.

   Andrea

   ----
   Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
   Scientific / Technical Project Officer
   European Commission DG JRC
   Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
   Unit B6 - Digital Economy
   Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
   21027 Ispra VA, Italy

   https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/


   ----
   The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
   not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
   position of the European Commission.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Karen Coyle [mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net]
   Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2018 4:35 PM
   To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
   Subject: ACTION on ALL - FPWDs

   All,

   We have two documents that are ready to be issued as First Public
   Working Drafts,[1] [2]  and we want to promote them to this at the
   meeting on November 13.[3] The ACTION on everyone is to READ these
   documents and let us know IMMEDIATELY if you see a serious problem that
   would keep either of these from being published. Remember that a FPWD is
   a DRAFT and that anything can change in future drafts. The purpose of
   the draft is to solicit comments from the community on the direction of
   the work.

   You can also comment on the content of the drafts where you see the need
   for modifications to future drafts, and we will create github issues and
   discuss these, but these comments will not delay the FPWD.

   We will take a consensus vote on these at the meeting. If you are
   sending regrets, please also let us know how you would vote on these drafts:

   +1 issue as FPWD
   0 abstain (but don't object)
   -1 object (and give your reason in enough detail that it can be addressed)

   kc
   [1] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/conneg-by-ap/

   [2] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/profilesont/

   [3] https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2018.11.13

   --
   Karen Coyle
   kcoyle@kcoyle.net<mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net> http://kcoyle.net

   m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
   skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600





--
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net<mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net> http://kcoyle.net

m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600