- From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 06:40:59 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@aisaac I like your suggestion that we treat it as a data model, without specifying a particular technology. That could mean that we define concepts in the text, and the RDF ontology could be a note showing one implementation (I think that implementations can be a note; need to check). The bulk, then, of what we provide would be to show the motivation for needing a profile description (DCAT-AP and Europeana are great examples). Then we have to decide between "should" and "may" but the fact is that we have few instances of profiles that use a description to date, so "may" might be appropriate for now because we are introducing something new. If it is taken up as an actual W3C effort then it could rise to "should" level. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/242#issuecomment-393047637 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2018 06:41:02 UTC