W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > July 2018

Re: [dxwg] Project context [RPCX]

From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 02:42:40 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-404371692-1531363359-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
If this pattern is agreed to be useful, then a key implementation question is
(i) do we recommend the use of properties from [PROV-O](https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/) directly, or 
(ii) do we 'clone' the PROV-O properties that we want to use into the `dcat` namespace, thus avoiding an additional dependency - see #111 

Note that an explicit dependency on PROV brings [entailments](https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/) and [constraints](https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-constraints/), the consequences of which might not be clear. 

If the cloning route is taken then we should include alignment axioms like 

`dcat:wasGeneratedBy owl:equivalentProperty prov:wasGeneratedBy .`

in the [DCAT-PROV alignment graph](https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/prov.ttl).  

GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/71#issuecomment-404371692 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2018 02:42:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 April 2019 13:45:00 UTC