W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > January 2018

RE: Profile definitions / DCAT update

From: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 01:49:03 +0000
To: <amgreiner@lbl.gov>, <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <d57c4493495c4e4c835bd26e0f384ff4@exch1-mel.nexus.csiro.au>
I tend to agree. 
Our job is to supply the tools. 
The communities will define their profiles. 
These might be done as community activities under W3C auspices, but most will likely not. 

Simon  

-----Original Message-----
From: Annette Greiner [mailto:amgreiner@lbl.gov] 
Sent: Friday, 5 January, 2018 12:00
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Profile definitions / DCAT update

I don't think we are supposed to be proposing specific profiles. My understanding is that we are providing guidance as to how others can propose their own. In any case, making a single profile for all scientific data would be about as easy as (in homage to Phil) boiling the ocean. But I do want to ensure that profiles are something that scientific communities can use (and define for themselves).

-Annette


On 1/4/18 4:31 PM, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>  i.e. should we propose a DCAT profile for scientific data (and then 
> delegate it to either a keen subgroup to add as a deliverable, or 
> describe the potential scope in the guidleline deliverable and then 
> park the issue)?
>
>

--
Annette Greiner
NERSC Data and Analytics Services
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory


Received on Friday, 5 January 2018 01:49:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 April 2019 13:44:56 UTC