W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > August 2018

Re: [dxwg] Use of dct:type with both Class and Concept

From: makxdekkers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 12:27:21 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-416934177-1535545640-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I agree with @dr-shorthair that DCAT will lose relevance if we are too strict. 
On the other hand, some of the machinery that we're using does care about strict rules; for example, using SHACL you can only validate that the object of a particular statement is an instance of a certain, expliclty defined class: the `skos:Concept` http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/marcgt/man fails the test for rdfs:Class. A human observer may not object to it but SHACL definitely does. I've seen a work-around in SHACL to just test whether there is a URI, and not look further into it. So, you could stick any URI into the statement and SHACL would not be able to catch it.
In a way, using `rangeIncludes` instead of `rdfs:range` makes the problem go away, but it would make the validation of objects with SHACL less clear (maybe impossible?).

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/314#issuecomment-416934177 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2018 12:27:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 April 2019 13:45:01 UTC