- From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:04:16 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@makxdekkers Since "rangeIncludes" is not an RDF standard concept, it wouldn't be treated as a rdfs:range by SHACL. rangeIncludes could be defined in a validation document to be whatever you want it to be. It would be just another locally defined property, which is what it is in schema.org. But in any case, to use a less strict definition it seems that DCAT should define its own property because dct:type is already defined with a specific range. If you want to include as values skos:concepts, URIs for classes, and perhaps also literals, you'll need a property with no rdfs:range, AFAIK. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/314#issuecomment-417008132 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2018 16:04:17 UTC