W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > April 2018

Re: [dxwg] Definition of "Schema" (as opposed to profile)

From: Lars G. Svensson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 16:50:54 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-382064525-1523983853-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
`ProcessableProfileImplementation` of course reflects nicely what it is. That said, it's a bit verbose and I don't know if IANA would accept an `Accept-ProcessableProfileImplementation`-header... As @aisaac said, `schema` is overloaded but so are most short catchy terms. My original suggestion for `schema` came indeec from XML Schema and the fact that someone (cannot remember who, but it was at the TPAC in Sapporo) told me that if RDF Schema hadn't been taken already, "RDF Shapes" most likely would have been name "RDF Schema". Hmmm, perhaps `shape` could be an alternative...

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by larsgsvensson
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/195#issuecomment-382064525 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2018 16:50:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 April 2019 13:44:58 UTC