W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > December 2017

Re: Start of profiles analysis page - 2nd reply

From: Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran <alejandra.gonzalezbeltran@oerc.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 17:37:56 +0000
To: kcoyle@kcoyle.net, public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <202e61e6-95ac-c7e3-6bb7-f605105ee184@oerc.ox.ac.uk>
Hi,

On 04/12/2017 17:15, Karen Coyle wrote:
> Hi, Alejandra. I didn't look at the wiki home page before I answered
> your email. The items under "Deliverables" should link to the github
> repo, I believe, not to pages that are working documents. So that item
> under Deliverables "Guidance on publishing application profiles" will
> have "Editor's draft" under it, and that will be the github location of
> the draft.
Sure, I agree that we should now point to the working documents in github.

We had these placeholders in the main page of the wiki 
(https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Main_Page) for ages - I believe
that Phil had created those pages.

In my previous email I was referring to the content of this page:

https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Guidance_on_publishing_application_profiles_of_vocabularies

that could be merged with the page you distributed today:

https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/ProfileContext

and whose information will eventually end up in the Github working 
document for profiles.


>   We could decide to do it differently, but that was my
> assumption based on past practice. Putting it under "Working documents"
> makes clear that what is there isn't what we intend to deliver as a
> document.
>
> Does that make sense?
Totally.

Thanks,

A

>
> kc
>
> On 12/4/17 8:37 AM, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran wrote:
>> Hi Karen, all,
>>
>> We had a page where Andrea and I had been compiling information about
>> the profiles here:
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Guidance_on_publishing_application_profiles_of_vocabularies
>>
>>
>> We should probably combine the information in the page you created.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Alejandra
>>
>> On 04/12/2017 15:42, Karen Coyle wrote:
>>> I created a page for "Profiles context" [1] similar to the one that was
>>> created for DCAT.[2] It has some definitions of "profile", "application
>>> profile" and "metadata application profile" that I found online, and has
>>> the start of a list of profiles from a variety of sources.
>>>
>>> If any of you can add to those sections that would be great, and
>>> particularly from business or science sources. The sources I found were
>>> mostly in the cultural heritage arena, and that's probably because
>>> that's the area that I know.
>>>
>>> I do think that agreeing on a definition is going to be one of our first
>>> steps, and it may take quite a bit of discussion. Perhaps in the next
>>> few days we can begin to create some proposed definitions, just to see
>>> where those take us.
>>>
>>> kc
>>> [1] https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/ProfileContext
>>> [2] https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/DCAT_Context
>>
>>
Received on Monday, 4 December 2017 17:38:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 April 2019 13:44:56 UTC