W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > November 2016

Re: BP Evidence example & call on Friday

From: Deirdre Lee <deirdre@derilinx.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 14:46:17 +0000
To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <7a2337fb-c1c7-769c-fd4c-d5e615dd69ed@derilinx.com>
Hi all,

Great work on gathering implementations!

I have added two BP examples at 
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1l_imkvTjIRizyQl23HnBP2FFzO_cx4Uvm2i7q5KbpCM/edit

Should we have a call on Friday to touch base? I can chair.

Cheers,

Deirdre


On 07/11/2016 12:42, Bernadette Farias Lóscio wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Thanks a lot for your contribution! I'm gonna include the new 
> evidences on our implementation and I'm gonna let you know when we 
> have a new version.
>
> It is great that you could provide some evidences for data enrichment 
> and APIs ;) Please, let me know if you have more suggestions!
>
> cheers,
> Berna
>
>
> 2016-11-04 10:55 GMT-03:00 Phil Archer <phila@w3.org 
> <mailto:phila@w3.org>>:
>
>     Hi Berna,
>
>     I've added a couple more reviews to the spreadsheet, from opposite
>     ends of the spectrum. One is an effort by one or two activists in
>     an off-shore island state (Guernsey) that is commendable in terms
>     of what it achieves given its origin; however, it doesn't score
>     well (not surprisingly). At the other end is datausa.io
>     <http://datausa.io> which is a highly professional aggregate and
>     visualisation site with serious funding. I reviewed this one in
>     particular as I thought it would be evidence for things that are
>     likely to be missing from simple portals, like enrichment. Another
>     one that comes to mind is http://opentrials.net/. I'll look at
>     that when I get time (unless someone beats me to it of course).
>
>     The datausa.io <http://datausa.io> site is not really a place
>     where you'd go to get a dataset. It's an 'infomediary' site but it
>     does link back to the original sources, most of which are US
>     census datasets. So it scores badly on things like metadata (I
>     can't find any) but really well on the API stuff.
>
>     HTH
>
>     Phil.
>
>
>     On 29/10/2016 18:08, Bernadette Farias Lóscio wrote:
>
>         Hi Phil,
>
>         Thanks a lot for your contribution!
>
>         I created and shared a spreadsheet with you on drive [1]. You
>         can use this
>         to collect all your evidences and later on i'm gonna include
>         them in the
>         implementation report. I already included the evidence from
>         CIARD Ring in
>         your spreadsheet.
>
>         Please, let me know if that is ok with you.
>
>         Cheers,
>         Berna
>
>         [1]
>         https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wKfwLhT1DCyuDtf_oY6HwB3mzf_4P5LrxmasLWxIa-o/edit?usp=sharing
>         <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wKfwLhT1DCyuDtf_oY6HwB3mzf_4P5LrxmasLWxIa-o/edit?usp=sharing>
>
>
>
>
>         2016-10-28 12:45 GMT-03:00 Phil Archer <phila@w3.org
>         <mailto:phila@w3.org>>:
>
>             Dear all,
>
>             Following today's call, I wanted to have another go at
>             reviewing a dataset
>             for evidence gathering for the BPs. I looked at a dataset
>             on the CIARD Ring
>             site which is run by a group allied to the FAO.
>             Specifically, I looked at
>
>             http://ring.ciard.net/chinese-crop-germplasm-information-system-cgris
>             <http://ring.ciard.net/chinese-crop-germplasm-information-system-cgris>
>
>             My results are below
>
>             I need to write to the folks who run the portal (I know
>             one of them at
>             least) and ask some questions related to some of the later
>             BPs but there's
>             some usable data here I hope.
>
>             I also wanted to know how long this would take me as I
>             need to follow up
>             on my action-297 and write to folks to ask them to do the
>             same. This took
>             me about half an hour. I imagine if I knew the dataset
>             better I could have
>             done it more quickly, but then I know the BPs pretty well
>             s I don't need to
>             consider that content in detail. My guess is that it would
>             be hard for a
>             dataset owner/portal manager to do this is less than half
>             an hour (and it
>             could easily take an hour).
>
>             CIARD Ring is a *very* good data portal (the best I know
>             of anywhere) with
>             tons of metadata but even on this portal there are gaps in
>             the metadata.
>
>             I'll provide some more examples in the coming week. I
>             can't currently edit
>             the Google doc which is one reason for sending the info in
>             this mail.
>
>             HTH
>
>             Phil
>
>             1.  Pass
>             2.  Pass
>             3.  Pass
>             4.  Partial. No machine readable licence, user has to
>             follow a link for
>             more info when you find actually it's all rights reserved.
>             5.  Pass - publisher with good level of human readable
>             info, although no
>             PROV data as such.
>             6.  Fail
>             7.  Partial
>             8.  Fail
>             9.  Pass
>             10. Pass
>             11. Fail
>             12. Pass
>             13. Data is behind firewall but seems very likely pass.
>             14. Fail (only RDF is provided)
>             15. Pass
>             16. Pass - this is a reference dataset
>             17. Partial - you could download with SELECT *
>             18. Partial - you could download a subset with a query
>             19. Pass (Web page has embedded RDFa)
>             20. N/A
>             21. Pass
>             22. N/A
>             23. Pass
>             24. Pass
>             25. Pass
>             26. Pass
>             27. N/A
>             28. N/A
>             29. Pass
>             30. Fail
>             31. N/A
>             32. Fail
>             33. Need to ask
>             34. Need to ask
>             35. Pass
>
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>
>
>     Phil Archer
>     Data Strategist, W3C
>     http://www.w3.org/
>
>     http://philarcher.org
>     +44 (0)7887 767755 <tel:%2B44%20%280%297887%20767755>
>     @philarcher1
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> Centro de Informática
> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
----------------------------------

Derilinx datAdore
Launch your own data portal in seconds

http://datadore.com/

----------------------------------
Deirdre Lee, CEO
Derilinx - Linked & Open Data Solutions
   
Web:      www.derilinx.com
Email:    deirdre@derilinx.com
Address:  11/12 Baggot Court, Dublin 2, D02 F891
Tel:      +353 (0)1 254 4316
Mob:      +353 (0)87 417 2318
Linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/
Twitter:  @deirdrelee
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2016 14:46:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 8 November 2016 14:46:56 UTC