W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > May 2016

Re: Implementation grid

From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 22:25:19 -0300
Message-ID: <CANx1PzwYaq0dFc_QMZccB-rTLQ2z88GtENRXgqjX8=sm0YjSQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Cc: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Phil,

Thanks a lot for creating the implementation grid! I was doing something
similar, but using google drive [1].

As we discussed before, I think we're gonna have two cases:

case 1: A dataset already exists and we can use it to show evidences for
the implementation of one or more BP
case 2: A new dataset is created and the publisher uses the DWBP document
to guide the publication process

In both cases it's gonna be difficult to have one dataset that can be used
as an evidence for the whole set of BP.  So, maybe we should think about
having a grid that shows the links for the evidences (datasets) rather than
showing if the implementation passed the test (I see this more clear for
Case 1, but maybe it is also possible for Case 2).

I was also thinking of having some questions to help identify relevant
tests for a given dataset as well as the filling of the grid.

these are some ideas to discuss in our meeting tomorrow ;)

cheers,
Berna

[1]
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1a9cOGzWJTIhh2OrAemvWBR8f0rv5xqvL03pJeMrotCo/edit?usp=sharing

2016-05-26 18:29 GMT-03:00 Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>:

> I've been thinking about, and trying to act on, the implementation grid,
> i.e. a means of collecting implementation info. The goal is to have a
> clearly understandable report that proves that each of our BPs has been
> implemented at least twice. Looking at the method used by the Mobile Web
> group all those years ago, they have a grid with a link to a separate page
> for each implementation report. It's a lot of fiddly work of course.
>
> We can't expect everyone to fill in a grid. I can create a questionnaire
> but to keep the barriers as low as possible, and to be practical, we're
> going to need to accept and interpret emails. So *we* might be the people
> filling in the grids.
>
> I've created a template on the wiki at [1]. The idea is that we can copy
> and paste that into multiple pages and record implementations and linbk to
> those from a master grid like the one at
> https://www.w3.org/2006/06/mwbp-implementation-report.
>
> Dunno if this is the right approach. Ideas welcome.
>
> Cheers
>
> Phil
>
> For tracker: Action-281
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
>
>


-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 27 May 2016 01:26:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 May 2016 01:26:08 UTC