Re: DWBP - Best Practices - Review

 

Hi, Annette, 

Thank you for your response. 

I am just recording that this is a thing that I am worried. I have to
put it in a review. The group has already voted to include these BPs and
it is a solved issue. 

I gave examples in the e-mails prior to the voting. Things like how to
maintain synchronicity with versions, how to choose vocabularies that
could be more suited depending on the datasets reused, how to merge
different reused datasets concepts, URI identification schemes, etc.
Reuse, imho, is a very sophisticated task, and I feel that we finished
the document just beginning what could be BPs for reuse, a very short
set. 

I think we have no time to go deeper in these discussions. Again, just
recording this is my review. 

Best Regards, Laufer 

---
. . . .. . . 
. . . ..
. .. . 

Em 18/04/2016 17:28, Annette Greiner escreveu: 

> Hi Laufer,
> I hope the doc will end up being something that you can support fully. If you could offer some examples of things that someone who wants to reuse data should think about that are not covered by our other BPs, we could talk about whether we need to address them. 
> -Annette
> 
> On 4/18/16 9:02 AM, Laufer wrote: 
> 
>> Dear editors, 
>> 
>> First of all congratulations. 
>> 
>> I was pleased to read the document and to see that it covers a very good set of concerns that someone has to think about if she wants to establish a good communication process between publishers and consumers of datasets. Besides that, the document deals with other related concerns about identification, preservation, privacy, enrichment, etc. 
>> 
>> My single objection is still about the BPs that deal with the reuse of data. I still think they are a very very small set of things that someone who wants to reuse data should think about. We vote it. But I have to comment this in my review. It makes me feel that we start to talk about a thing that needs much more thinking and much more best practices. 
>> 
>> Some minor errors: 
>> 
>> 1. The term "best practice" sometimes is written in lower cases and sometimes in upper cases. 
>> 
>> 2. The example of dataset used in the document has changed from timetables to bus stops tables but in the file [1] "Example of Dataset - Human readable" we have a mixed thing. 
>> 
>> Thank you again to the editors and to all members of the group. 
>> 
>> Best Regards, Laufer 
>> 
>> [1] - http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/dwbp-example.html#dataset-strucutral-metadata [1] 
>> 
>> -- 
>> . . . .. . . 
>> . . . ..
>> . .. .
> 
> -- 
> Annette Greiner
> NERSC Data and Analytics Services
> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
 

Links:
------
[1]
http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/dwbp-example.html#dataset-strucutral-metadata