Re: DWBP - Best Practices - Review

Dear Laufer and Annette,

thank you very much for your comments!

We very much appreciate if we can keep this discussion and try to get 
into a resolution until next Friday.

Kind regards,
BP Editors

On 18/04/16 19:40, Laufer wrote:
>
> Hi, Annette,
> Thank you for your response.
> I am just recording that this is a thing that I am worried. I have to 
> put it in a review. The group has already voted to include these BPs 
> and it is a solved issue.
> I gave examples in the e-mails prior to the voting. Things like how to 
> maintain synchronicity with versions, how to  choose vocabularies that 
> could be more suited depending on the datasets reused, how to merge 
> different reused datasets concepts, URI identification schemes, etc. 
> Reuse, imho, is a very sophisticated task, and I feel that we finished 
> the document just beginning what could be BPs for reuse, a very short set.
> I think we have no time to go deeper in these discussions. Again, just 
> recording this is my review.
> Best Regards, Laufer
> ---
>
> .  .  .  .. .  .
> .        .   . ..
> .     ..       .
>
> Em 18/04/2016 17:28, Annette Greiner escreveu:
>
>> Hi Laufer,
>> I hope the doc will end up being something that you can support 
>> fully. If you could offer some examples of things that someone who 
>> wants to reuse data should think about that are not covered by our 
>> other BPs, we could talk about whether we need to address them.
>> -Annette
>>
>> On 4/18/16 9:02 AM, Laufer wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear editors,
>>>
>>> First of all congratulations.
>>>
>>> I was pleased to read the document and to see that it covers a very 
>>> good set of concerns that someone has to think about if she wants to 
>>> establish a good communication process between publishers and 
>>> consumers of datasets. Besides that, the document deals with other 
>>> related concerns about identification, preservation, privacy, 
>>> enrichment, etc.
>>>
>>> My single objection is still about the BPs that deal with the reuse 
>>> of data. I still think they are a very very small set of things that 
>>> someone who wants to reuse data should think about. We vote it. But 
>>> I have to comment this in my review. It makes me feel that we start 
>>> to talk about a thing that needs much more thinking and much more 
>>> best practices.
>>>
>>> Some minor errors:
>>>
>>> 1. The term "best practice" sometimes is written in lower cases and 
>>> sometimes in upper cases.
>>>
>>> 2. The example of dataset used in the document has changed from 
>>> timetables to bus stops tables but in the file [1] "Example of 
>>> Dataset - Human readable" we have a mixed thing.
>>>
>>> Thank you again to the editors and to all members of the group.
>>>
>>> Best Regards, Laufer
>>>
>>> [1] - 
>>> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/dwbp-example.html#dataset-strucutral-metadata
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>
>>> .  .  .  .. .  .
>>> .        .   . ..
>>> .     ..       .
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Annette Greiner
>> NERSC Data and Analytics Services
>> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
>>