Re: Check if the example of Best Practice 37: Cite the Original Publication is correct

Hi Annette,

Okay I'll rework this and send it back tonight, I think that it would be
appropriate to describe derivation with PROV-O [1].

Cheers,

Eric S

References
[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-primer/#derivation-and-revision

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov> wrote:

> Eric,
> Looking at this now, I'm not sure we were thinking of the same thing. I
> was thinking this should show how a derived dataset would cite the original
> it was derived from. I'm not sure what relationship you intended with the
> "memorandum". The human-readable UI version (I was thinking of a web app
> citing the data) could probably be
>
> Data source: MyCity Transit Agency, "Bus Stops of MyCity", Version 1.0,
> May 5, 2015. DOI: 10.3456/4567.21.
>
> -Annette
>
> On 4/6/16 11:42 AM, Caroline Burle wrote:
>
> Dear Eric and Annette,
>
> We are wondering if would be possible for you to review the example of
> Best Practice 37: Cite the Original Publication [1] and check if it is
> correct before our next meeting on Friday. We kindly ask you to let us know
> if you need help with that.
>
> Thank you! Kind regards,
> BP Editors
>
> [1] w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#CiteOriginalPublication
>
>
> --
> Annette Greiner
> NERSC Data and Analytics Services
> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
>
>
>