Re: BPs for linksets

Hi Phil,

Busy day today, so this is just a quick note to express:
1) While I didn't know there was a specific term linksets, it makes a lot
of sense because communities outside of the spatial data perspective are
grappling with this problem.
2) Some examples that come to mind:
   a) The Atmosphere Radiation Measurement program has instrumentation that
produces measurements. These measurements must be restructured in such a
way that simulation modeler consumers can use their data.  So temperature
measurement data streams A, B, C are integrated to create a "Value Added
Product" D to provide a composite of the best temperature measurements for
the simulation modeler consumer.   If I were reviewing results M produced
by the simulation modeler, I might want to look at D and how D originated
from streams A, B, C for a full disclosure record.
   b) Heterogeneous data collected in datasets or measured in a variety of
ways and the composite of represent either a profile of a physical
phenomena (performance metrics).
  c) A series quantum chemistry simulations are run to predict the behavior
of molecules under various conditions.  Each simulation represents a
separate dataset.    A linkset ties together a portion (e.g. lines
2200-4500 in file A of dataset Z)  of each dataset distribution that
represents an insight or anomaly.

Does this help?

Eric S

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Laufer <laufer@globo.com> wrote:

>
>
> Hi, Phil,
>
> I think it is interesting. What I can see (at first sight) is that the
> group is interested in how to give metadata about a relation between
> linksets. In a broader sense, when our group was discussing versions,
> we talked about the idea of datasets having different types of relations. I
> think that here we have a relationship class that has properties that are
> associated with a relation between two datasets. I think this also applies
> to the case of diff between versions of a dataset. Summarizing, we have a
> relation between two datasets (or linksets) that has properties. Another
> thing is what vocabularies will be suitable for describing each set of
> properties of this relation.
>
> Laufer
> ---
>
> .  .  .  .. .  .
> .        .   . ..
> .     ..       .
>
>
>
> Em 27/10/2015 3:07, Phil Archer escreveu:
>
> Annette, Eric, Sumit,
>
> I have you in mind although this is open to everyone in the WG (Laufer?)...
>
> Again from the Spatial Data WG, there is a lot of discussion going on here
> about Linksets and how to publish them. There is interest here in working
> on a Note on this, but it needs to have non-spatial people concerned as
> well since it's applicable to any kind of data.
>
> So we're talking about publishing information about how to interpret a
> dataset in relation to others (A's garden is B's yard, A's foo includes B's
> bar and baz)
>
> Does this resonate with you at all?
>
> Phil.
>
>