W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > October 2015

Re: BPs for linksets

From: Laufer <laufer@globo.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:00:15 -0200
To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Cc: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>, Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>, "Purohit, Sumit" <Sumit.Purohit@pnnl.gov>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <67a1aa04f69715196012c13006bc417f@globo.com>

Hi, Phil, 

I think it is interesting. What I can see (at first sight) is that the
group is interested in how to give metadata about a relation between
linksets. In a broader sense, when our group was discussing versions, we
talked about the idea of datasets having different types of relations. I
think that here we have a relationship class that has properties that
are associated with a relation between two datasets. I think this also
applies to the case of diff between versions of a dataset. Summarizing,
we have a relation between two datasets (or linksets) that has
properties. Another thing is what vocabularies will be suitable for
describing each set of properties of this relation. 

. . . .. . . 
. . . ..
. .. . 

Em 27/10/2015 3:07, Phil Archer escreveu: 

> Annette, Eric, Sumit,
> I have you in mind although this is open to everyone in the WG (Laufer?)...
> Again from the Spatial Data WG, there is a lot of discussion going on here about Linksets and how to publish them. There is interest here in working on a Note on this, but it needs to have non-spatial people concerned as well since it's applicable to any kind of data.
> So we're talking about publishing information about how to interpret a dataset in relation to others (A's garden is B's yard, A's foo includes B's bar and baz)
> Does this resonate with you at all?
> Phil.
Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2015 17:00:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 27 October 2015 17:00:48 UTC