Hi, Phil, I think it is interesting. What I can see (at first sight) is that the group is interested in how to give metadata about a relation between linksets. In a broader sense, when our group was discussing versions, we talked about the idea of datasets having different types of relations. I think that here we have a relationship class that has properties that are associated with a relation between two datasets. I think this also applies to the case of diff between versions of a dataset. Summarizing, we have a relation between two datasets (or linksets) that has properties. Another thing is what vocabularies will be suitable for describing each set of properties of this relation. Laufer --- . . . .. . . . . . .. . .. . Em 27/10/2015 3:07, Phil Archer escreveu: > Annette, Eric, Sumit, > > I have you in mind although this is open to everyone in the WG (Laufer?)... > > Again from the Spatial Data WG, there is a lot of discussion going on here about Linksets and how to publish them. There is interest here in working on a Note on this, but it needs to have non-spatial people concerned as well since it's applicable to any kind of data. > > So we're talking about publishing information about how to interpret a dataset in relation to others (A's garden is B's yard, A's foo includes B's bar and baz) > > Does this resonate with you at all? > > Phil.
Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2015 17:00:48 UTC