W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > October 2015

dwbp-ISSUE-205: [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary]

From: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:49:45 +0000
To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1ZoIJN-000EXn-DI@deneb.w3.org>
dwbp-ISSUE-205:  [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary]

http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/205

Raised by: Antoine Isaac
On product: Quality & Granularity Vocabulary

Should we represent dimensions and categories instance of skos:Concept [1]? This would allow publishers of quality framework to express (hierarchical) relations between dimensions or categories. This could also enable to align with quality-focused categorizations, which might not be focused on metrics. Including the DWBP Best Practices dimensions [2], or even the parts of DQV about annotations. 

[1] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept
[2] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html
Received on Monday, 19 October 2015 21:49:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 19 October 2015 21:49:47 UTC