W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > October 2015

Re: dwbp-ISSUE-200: Can we align the quality dimension hints in DQV with the ones in ISO 25012? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary]

From: Debattista, Jeremy <Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:50:45 +0000
To: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
CC: Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>, "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0FEBA3C1-5EA7-414F-8F9A-0412B891C200@iais.fraunhofer.de>
Hi Ghislain,

> At the same time, I am curious to hear from Zaveri et al. what they think about the ISO classifications. It did a quick search of “ISO 25012” in the survey without any result. Probably I need to check carefully the paper to see whether ISO was out of scope of their work.

IIRC, the survey of Zaveri et al. was based on research work (to act as a comprehensive survey) rather than existing standards (don’t ask me why.. i don’t know the answer for that :)). It is more likely to find mapping to the ISO standard in the cited papers themselves rather than the survey. I agree that there should be a mapping between the ISO and the survey paper. I can ask Amrapali Zaveri myself, or add her to this email thread if it is more appropriate.

Received on Monday, 5 October 2015 15:51:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 5 October 2015 15:51:27 UTC