W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > October 2015

Re: dwbp-ISSUE-200: Can we align the quality dimension hints in DQV with the ones in ISO 25012? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary]

From: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:35:24 +0200
Cc: "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <EC43F180-B854-40E4-8E2E-D869818BC0F1@eurecom.fr>
To: Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
Hi Ricardo, all ,
> Le 5 oct. 2015 à 12:39, Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it> a écrit :
> So my proposal is to align the current  DQV  classifications with the ISO, but also citing the classification from zaveri et al as a possible classification to be adopted.
> How the group feels about this proposal? 
+1 to this proposal. I also think we 
> I guess that some sort of mapping between the two classifications would be helpful, but   I am neither  sure  that mapping can be  easy  found nor it is in the scope of our work. Perhaps we should ask to externals ( and  Zaveri, Maurino & Co in particular )  if anyone has already defined such a  mapping.
At the same time, I am curious to hear from Zaveri et al. what they think about the ISO classifications. It did a quick search of “ISO 25012” in the survey without any result. Probably I need to check carefully the paper to see whether ISO was out of scope of their work.


Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D
Google+: http://google.com/+GhislainATEMEZING
Twitter: @gatemezing
About Me: https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing <https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing>
Received on Monday, 5 October 2015 15:36:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 5 October 2015 15:36:13 UTC