W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > February 2015

Discrepancy in DWBP W3C First Public Working Draft 24 February 2015

From: Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M) <Lewis.J.Mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:22:18 +0000
To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D1122B2A.DEFF%lewis.j.mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov>
Hi Folks,
I noticed a hyperlink in the following section [0].

“Each one of these challenges originated one or more requirements as documented in the use-cases document<http://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp-ucr/#R-UniqueIdentifier>.”

The above should link to [1]… No?
If yes I can submit a PR.

[0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-20150224/#challenges
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp-ucr/

Dr. Lewis John McGibbney Ph.D., B.Sc., MAGU
Engineering Applications Software Engineer Level 2
Computer Science for Data Intensive Systems Group 398M
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
California Institute of Technology
4800 Oak Grove Drive
Pasadena, California 91109-8099
Mail Stop : 158-256C
Tel:  (+1) (818)-393-7402
Cell: (+1) (626)-487-3476
Fax:  (+1) (818)-393-1190
Email: lewis.j.mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov


 Dare Mighty Things

From: Michel Dumontier <michel.dumontier@stanford.edu<mailto:michel.dumontier@stanford.edu>>
Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at 8:21 AM
To: Jérémie Astori <jeremie@w3.org<mailto:jeremie@w3.org>>
Cc: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org<mailto:phila@w3.org>>, Webmaster <webreq@w3.org<mailto:webreq@w3.org>>, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br<mailto:bfl@cin.ufpe.br>>, Newton Calegari <newton@nic.br<mailto:newton@nic.br>>, Caroline Burle <cburle@nic.br<mailto:cburle@nic.br>>, "Deirdre Lee (Derilinx)" <deirdre@derilinx.com<mailto:deirdre@derilinx.com>>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: Publication Request: one FPWD & an update
Resent-From: <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at 8:22 AM

 bio2rdf.org<http://bio2rdf.org> main site was non-responsive, back up now.


Michel Dumontier, PhD
Associate Professor of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics)
Stanford University

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Jérémie Astori <jeremie@w3.org<mailto:jeremie@w3.org>> wrote:
Hi Phil,

I am still unable to run the pubrules checker for these documents as they never terminate. I am guessing it comes from timeouts on bio2rdf.org<http://bio2rdf.org>.
I am surprised you managed to run the checkers?


On 02/24/2015 06:15 AM, Phil Archer wrote:
+cc Michel Dumontier

Thanks Jérémie,

I ran the link checker against the FPWD but, stupidly, didn't on the UCR doc - which is the one that really needed it.

I've been through the UCR and made all the necessary corrections. Link checker now reports that all internal links are good.

As ever, it reports some errors where none exist.

Are all fine in a browser, i.e. not 404s

I am reluctant to remove the link to bio2rdf.org<http://bio2rdf.org> as I believe this is a temporary problem with that site. Michel Dumontier is one of the
custodians of that site and has been altered (he's on the west coast so let's be reasonable!) If there's a bigger problem with bio2rdf then I'm
sure he'll let us know.

Hope this is all good to go now.


On 24/02/2015 00:30, Jérémie Astori wrote:
Hi Phil,

There are a few issues with these documents:


- Just before "2.25 Web Observatory", one href is
R-DataMissingIncomplete instead of #R-DataMissingIncomplete.
- Just before "2.5 Dados.gov.br<http://Dados.gov.br>", one href R-SensitiveSecurity instead
of #R-SensitiveSecurity.
- http://www.gs1.org/digital is a 404
- http://bio2rdf.org/ is a 503
- Broken fragments:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#UC-DutchBaseReg (lines
2378, 2456, 2493, 2558, 2701, 2744)
(lines 2368, 2378, 2387, 2398, 2408, 2436, 2446, 2467, 2546, 2592, 2609,
2616, 2631, 2642, 2653, 2776, 2785, 2794, 2805, 2868)
(lines 934, 1369, 1870)
(line 572)
(line 2293)
http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#R-VocabOpen%20 (line
http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#R-AccessRelTime (line
http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#UC-WindCharacterization (lines
2390, 2480, 2549, 2564)
http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#UC-TheLandPortal (line
(line 368)
(line 938)
http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#R-AcessUptodate (line
http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#UC-DataUsage (line 2867)
(lines 569, 2040, 2216)
(line 2110)
http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#R-VocabDocum%20 (line
(lines 2547, 2561, 2632)
http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#UC-ISOGEOStory (line
http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#R-FormatMachineReadable (line
(lines 2387, 2447, 2458, 2478, 2508, 2524, 2858, 2868)
(line 2307)

Could you fix these please?
Please run [1] when you are done with the fixes to make sure the links
are fine.

## Removing the wrong document

FYI, here are the steps I followed:

jeremie@pompomgalli:~$ cvs co WWW/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-ucr-20150224/
cvs checkout: Updating WWW/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-ucr-20150224
U WWW/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-ucr-20150224/Overview.html
jeremie@pompomgalli:~$ cd !$
cd WWW/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-ucr-20150224/
jeremie@pompomgalli:~/WWW/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-ucr-20150224$ rm Overview.html
jeremie@pompomgalli:~/WWW/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-ucr-20150224$ cvs rm
cvs remove: scheduling `Overview.html' for removal
cvs remove: use `cvs commit' to remove this file permanently
jeremie@pompomgalli:~/WWW/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-ucr-20150224$ cvs ci -m
'Remove wrong document'
cvs commit: Examining .
/w3ccvs/WWW/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-ucr-20150224/Overview.html,v  <--
new revision: delete; previous revision: 1.1

The empty repository remains but that's an unfortunate drawback of CVS.


The pubrules checker complains that the copyright statement is:

 > Copyright © 2015 W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio, Beihang), W3C liability,
trademark and document use rules apply.

instead of being:

 > Copyright © 2015 W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio, Beihang). W3C liability,
trademark and document use rules apply.

So, could you find the hidden typo?
", W3C" -> you put a comma instead of a dot! :-)
Could you fix this please?

Also, neither pubrules or the link checker could terminate. I am
guessing one of the links within the documents doesn't respond and the
systems never timeout. Could you check the links to see what happens in
the document please?





On 02/21/2015 03:19 PM, Phil Archer wrote:
Dear Webmaster,

This is a publication request for two linked documents. The first is a
simple update:


is the latest version of "Data on the Web Best Practices Use Cases &


the previous one being at



This document lists use cases, compiled by the Data on the Web Best
Practices Working Group, that represent scenarios of how data is commonly
published on the Web and how it is used. This document also provides a
set of requirements derived from these use cases that will be used to
guide the development of the set of Data on the Web Best Practices and
the development of two new vocabularies: Quality and Granularity
Description Vocabulary and Data Usage Description Vocabulary.

The document is in place and is, I believe, pubrules compliant.

Record of WG resolution is at

NB. This iteration marks a switch from WD to NOTE (this is a UCR, so
not on the Rec Track). But I goofed... I created
http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-ucr-20150224/ which was a mistake.
Can you please delete this? Thanks.

The WG has also resolved to publish the FPWD of its "Data on the Web
Best Practices"


Ralph approved the short URL in a mail to you and me on 26 Jan.

The doc is installed and pubrules compliant at


This document provides best practices related to the publication and
usage of data on the Web designed to help support a self-sustaining
ecosystem. Data should be discoverable and understandable by humans
and machines. Where data is used in some way, whether by the
originator of
the data or by an external party, such usage should also be
discoverable and the efforts of the data publisher recognized. In
short, following
these best practices will facilitate interaction between publishers
and consumers.

I am not sure which category the UCR doc is in? But I'd like to create
a new category of 'Data on the Web' into which this BP doc and the
outputs of the Spatial Data on the Web WG will go in due course. Can
the UCR doc be included in this new category too?

And before you ask, here's some blurb for the announcement:

The <a href="/2013/dwbp/">Data on the Web Best Practices Working
Group</a> has today published the first public working draft of its
output document. The WG is tackling the very broad topic of data
publishing, covering government, cultural heritage and commercial
data, open
data, closed data, linked data &hellip; it's a very broad canvas.
Consequently a number of issues remain very open and the working group
are keen to receive feedback so as to guide the work to completion.
The aim is to offer advice that is helpful today and likely to remain
helpful as technologies evolve. The first public working draft of the
<a href="/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-20150224/">Data on the Web Best
Practices</a> is
complemented by a substantial update to the group's <a
href="/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/">Use Cases and
Requirements</a>. New use cases
include NASA's <a
href="/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#UC-ASO">Airborne Snow
Observatory</a> (which is also relevant to the new <a
href="/2015/spatial/">Spatial Data on the Web Working Group</a>) and
the <a href="/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#UC-SharePSI">European
Union-funded Share-PSI project</a>.

I know you'll let me know if there are any queries.



(image/png attachment: 2CB3CA5F-DC06-45EF-ADDA-C49A41A8C401_8_.png)

Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2015 21:23:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 24 February 2015 21:23:21 UTC