W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > February 2015

Re: Publication Request: one FPWD & an update

From: Michel Dumontier <michel.dumontier@stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:21:40 -0800
Message-ID: <CALcEXf6PzNm6SkqObUpA70GezkcreeAzT3E+vn__pw_fzYyYnQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jérémie Astori <jeremie@w3.org>
Cc: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, Webmaster <webreq@w3.org>, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>, Newton Calegari <newton@nic.br>, Caroline Burle <cburle@nic.br>, "Deirdre Lee (Derilinx)" <deirdre@derilinx.com>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
 bio2rdf.org main site was non-responsive, back up now.

m.

Michel Dumontier, PhD
Associate Professor of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics)
Stanford University
http://dumontierlab.com

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Jérémie Astori <jeremie@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi Phil,
>
> I am still unable to run the pubrules checker for these documents as they
> never terminate. I am guessing it comes from timeouts on bio2rdf.org.
> I am surprised you managed to run the checkers?
>
> Jérémie
>
>
> On 02/24/2015 06:15 AM, Phil Archer wrote:
>
>> +cc Michel Dumontier
>>
>> Thanks Jérémie,
>>
>> I ran the link checker against the FPWD but, stupidly, didn't on the UCR
>> doc - which is the one that really needed it.
>>
>> I've been through the UCR and made all the necessary corrections. Link
>> checker now reports that all internal links are good.
>>
>> As ever, it reports some errors where none exist.
>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/ontologies
>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/ontologies/
>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/ontologies/coreconcepts/1.9.ttl
>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/ontologies/coreconcepts
>> http://www.socrata.com/
>> http://opendatacommons.org/
>>
>> Are all fine in a browser, i.e. not 404s
>>
>> I am reluctant to remove the link to bio2rdf.org as I believe this is a
>> temporary problem with that site. Michel Dumontier is one of the
>> custodians of that site and has been altered (he's on the west coast so
>> let's be reasonable!) If there's a bigger problem with bio2rdf then I'm
>> sure he'll let us know.
>>
>> Hope this is all good to go now.
>>
>> Phil.
>>
>>
>> On 24/02/2015 00:30, Jérémie Astori wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Phil,
>>>
>>> There are a few issues with these documents:
>>>
>>> ## NOTE
>>>
>>> - Just before "2.25 Web Observatory", one href is
>>> R-DataMissingIncomplete instead of #R-DataMissingIncomplete.
>>> - Just before "2.5 Dados.gov.br", one href R-SensitiveSecurity instead
>>> of #R-SensitiveSecurity.
>>> - http://www.gs1.org/digital is a 404
>>> - http://bio2rdf.org/ is a 503
>>> - Broken fragments:
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#UC-DutchBaseReg (lines
>>> 2378, 2456, 2493, 2558, 2701, 2744)
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#UC-OKFNTransport
>>> (lines 2368, 2378, 2387, 2398, 2408, 2436, 2446, 2467, 2546, 2592, 2609,
>>> 2616, 2631, 2642, 2653, 2776, 2785, 2794, 2805, 2868)
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#R-AccessUpToDate
>>> (lines 934, 1369, 1870)
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#R-MetadatAvailable
>>> (line 572)
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#h4_can-req-versioning
>>> (line 2293)
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#R-VocabOpen%20 (line
>>> 2110)
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#R-AccessRelTime (line
>>> 1559)
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#UC-
>>> WindCharacterization (lines
>>> 2390, 2480, 2549, 2564)
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#UC-TheLandPortal (line
>>> 2367)
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#R-VocabVersion%20
>>> (line 368)
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#R-
>>> PersisentIdentification
>>> (line 938)
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#R-AcessUptodate (line
>>> 1762)
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#UC-DataUsage (line
>>> 2867)
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#R-
>>> DataUnavailabilityReference
>>> (lines 569, 2040, 2216)
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#R-VocabReference%20
>>> (line 2110)
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#R-VocabDocum%20 (line
>>> 2109)
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#UC-
>>> OpenExperimenatlFieldStudies
>>> (lines 2547, 2561, 2632)
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#UC-ISOGEOStory (line
>>> 2830)
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#R-
>>> FormatMachineReadable (line
>>> 1371)
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#UC-
>>> OpenExperimentalFieldStudies
>>> (lines 2387, 2447, 2458, 2478, 2508, 2524, 2858, 2868)
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#h4_can-req-feedback
>>> (line 2307)
>>>
>>> Could you fix these please?
>>> Please run [1] when you are done with the fixes to make sure the links
>>> are fine.
>>>
>>> ## Removing the wrong document
>>>
>>> FYI, here are the steps I followed:
>>>
>>> [[
>>> jeremie@pompomgalli:~$ cvs co WWW/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-ucr-20150224/
>>> cvs checkout: Updating WWW/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-ucr-20150224
>>> U WWW/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-ucr-20150224/Overview.html
>>> jeremie@pompomgalli:~$ cd !$
>>> cd WWW/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-ucr-20150224/
>>> jeremie@pompomgalli:~/WWW/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-ucr-20150224$ rm Overview.html
>>> jeremie@pompomgalli:~/WWW/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-ucr-20150224$ cvs rm
>>> Overview.html
>>> cvs remove: scheduling `Overview.html' for removal
>>> cvs remove: use `cvs commit' to remove this file permanently
>>> jeremie@pompomgalli:~/WWW/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-ucr-20150224$ cvs ci -m
>>> 'Remove wrong document'
>>> cvs commit: Examining .
>>> /w3ccvs/WWW/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-ucr-20150224/Overview.html,v  <--
>>> Overview.html
>>> new revision: delete; previous revision: 1.1
>>> jeremie@pompomgalli:~/WWW/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-ucr-20150224$
>>> ]]
>>>
>>> The empty repository remains but that's an unfortunate drawback of CVS.
>>>
>>> ## FPWD
>>>
>>> The pubrules checker complains that the copyright statement is:
>>>
>>>  > Copyright © 2015 W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio, Beihang), W3C liability,
>>> trademark and document use rules apply.
>>>
>>> instead of being:
>>>
>>>  > Copyright © 2015 W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio, Beihang). W3C liability,
>>> trademark and document use rules apply.
>>>
>>> So, could you find the hidden typo?
>>> ", W3C" -> you put a comma instead of a dot! :-)
>>> Could you fix this please?
>>>
>>> Also, neither pubrules or the link checker could terminate. I am
>>> guessing one of the links within the documents doesn't respond and the
>>> systems never timeout. Could you check the links to see what happens in
>>> the document please?
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jérémie
>>>
>>> [1]:
>>> http://validator.w3.org/checklink?uri=http://www.w3.
>>> org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/&recursive=on
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/21/2015 03:19 PM, Phil Archer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Webmaster,
>>>>
>>>> This is a publication request for two linked documents. The first is a
>>>> simple update:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/
>>>>
>>>> is the latest version of "Data on the Web Best Practices Use Cases &
>>>> Requirements"
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp-ucr/,
>>>>
>>>> the previous one being at
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-dwbp-ucr-20141014/.
>>>>
>>>> Abstract:
>>>>
>>>> This document lists use cases, compiled by the Data on the Web Best
>>>> Practices Working Group, that represent scenarios of how data is
>>>> commonly
>>>> published on the Web and how it is used. This document also provides a
>>>> set of requirements derived from these use cases that will be used to
>>>> guide the development of the set of Data on the Web Best Practices and
>>>> the development of two new vocabularies: Quality and Granularity
>>>> Description Vocabulary and Data Usage Description Vocabulary.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The document is in place and is, I believe, pubrules compliant.
>>>>
>>>> Record of WG resolution is at
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-01-23#resolution_3
>>>>
>>>> NB. This iteration marks a switch from WD to NOTE (this is a UCR, so
>>>> not on the Rec Track). But I goofed... I created
>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-ucr-20150224/ which was a mistake.
>>>> Can you please delete this? Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> The WG has also resolved to publish the FPWD of its "Data on the Web
>>>> Best Practices"
>>>>
>>>> https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-02-20#resolution_2
>>>>
>>>> Ralph approved the short URL in a mail to you and me on 26 Jan.
>>>>
>>>> The doc is installed and pubrules compliant at
>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-20150224/
>>>>
>>>> Abstract:
>>>>
>>>> This document provides best practices related to the publication and
>>>> usage of data on the Web designed to help support a self-sustaining
>>>> ecosystem. Data should be discoverable and understandable by humans
>>>> and machines. Where data is used in some way, whether by the
>>>> originator of
>>>> the data or by an external party, such usage should also be
>>>> discoverable and the efforts of the data publisher recognized. In
>>>> short, following
>>>> these best practices will facilitate interaction between publishers
>>>> and consumers.
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure which category the UCR doc is in? But I'd like to create
>>>> a new category of 'Data on the Web' into which this BP doc and the
>>>> outputs of the Spatial Data on the Web WG will go in due course. Can
>>>> the UCR doc be included in this new category too?
>>>>
>>>> And before you ask, here's some blurb for the announcement:
>>>>
>>>> The <a href="/2013/dwbp/">Data on the Web Best Practices Working
>>>> Group</a> has today published the first public working draft of its
>>>> primary
>>>> output document. The WG is tackling the very broad topic of data
>>>> publishing, covering government, cultural heritage and commercial
>>>> data, open
>>>> data, closed data, linked data &hellip; it's a very broad canvas.
>>>> Consequently a number of issues remain very open and the working group
>>>> members
>>>> are keen to receive feedback so as to guide the work to completion.
>>>> The aim is to offer advice that is helpful today and likely to remain
>>>> helpful as technologies evolve. The first public working draft of the
>>>> <a href="/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-20150224/">Data on the Web Best
>>>> Practices</a> is
>>>> complemented by a substantial update to the group's <a
>>>> href="/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/">Use Cases and
>>>> Requirements</a>. New use cases
>>>> include NASA's <a
>>>> href="/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#UC-ASO">Airborne Snow
>>>> Observatory</a> (which is also relevant to the new <a
>>>> href="/2015/spatial/">Spatial Data on the Web Working Group</a>) and
>>>> the <a href="/TR/2015/NOTE-dwbp-ucr-20150224/#UC-SharePSI">European
>>>> Union-funded Share-PSI project</a>.
>>>>
>>>> I know you'll let me know if there are any queries.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Phil.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2015 16:22:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 24 February 2015 16:22:41 UTC