W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > November 2014

Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it

From: Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 16:42:23 +0100
Message-ID: <CABP9CAGwT-u4Y5Kjkz-3vBncJxxnNhscdmT1KkyrfJ038_gmfA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
CC: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>, "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Yup, +1! :)

Thanks for the rewrite.

Christophe

--
Sent with difficulties. Sorry for the brievety and typos...
Op 28 nov. 2014 15:13 schreef "Ghislain Atemezing" <
auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>:

> Hi Bernadette,
> [ Thanks for the rewording ] ..
>
> *R-VersionURIDesign*: “Publishers should consider having a canonical way
> to design URIs for different versions of the resources."
>
> Then we need to make clear what resource means. We can point to an
> existing resource definition, for example.
>
>
> It’s fine to me, as far as we define clearly the concepts. Let’s see if
> Christophe agrees now ;)
>
> Cheers,
> Ghislain
>
Received on Friday, 28 November 2014 15:42:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:24:18 UTC