- From: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 05:59:21 -0700
- To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Here are two suggested items for our upcoming vocabulary meeting this week: 1) Vocabulary development methodology - Are vocabularies being defined going to need separate concept model working drafts? Because we are supporting data on the web this seems appropriate. The W3C PROV Working Group produced a family of documents [1] to support the provenance vocabulary. Prior to writing specific vocabulary implementation working drafts an underlying conceptual model called the PROV Data Model working draft [2] was developed. As PROV implementation working drafts [3,4,5] were developed any changes that affected the underlying PROV Data Model were coordinated so that synchronization was maintained with the underlying conceptual model. 2) Publication policies and standards [6,7] After some digging I found some resources for publishing technical documents. Perhaps we could get some guidance on the best path forward for developing our working drafts and making sure they are consistent. References [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-prov-overview-20130430/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-dm-20130430/ [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-o-20130430/ [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-prov-xml-20130430/ [5] http://www.w3.org/Submission/2013/SUBM-prov-json-20130424/ (this was only a submission) [6] http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-pubrules-about#submission [7] http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules
Received on Monday, 7 July 2014 12:59:49 UTC