W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > February 2014

Re: W3C Process

From: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:59:41 +0100
Message-ID: <530C5B7D.208@eurecom.fr>
To: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
CC: Steven Adler <adler1@us.ibm.com>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, DWBP Chairs <member-dwbp-chairs@w3.org>
Hi Eric, Stephen, all

> Thank you for sharing your concerns, the last couple of meetings I
> looked at the clock and wondered where the time had gone:-)    Just a
> few thoughts here, I'm wondering from a time management perspective:
>     * put estimated time lengths for each discussion topic. (do we do
> this?  I can't remember)
>     * have a volunteer meeting time keeper who reminds us when we our
> discussions have gone over.
Mmm..I suggest to keep this task to the chairs
>     * agree for more lengthy discussions to have a separate meeting or
> have the discussion continue in email.
+1, and this will be more easy when we define clearly the scope of our 
different best practices doc.
>     * Instead of having some meeting items in the agenda, start them in
> email and then summarize the outcome of the discussion in the meeting.
>     * agreed about communicating actions status the night before
I am pretty sure (by experience ;-) ) that our F2F1 in London will act 
as a catalyst for further discussion, either by email or during our 


Ghislain Atemezing
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
Campus SophiaTech
450, route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
e-mail: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8178
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2014 09:00:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:24:06 UTC