Re: Lifecycle "Big picture"--quick and dirty draft

Hi Ghislain,

Thanks for the updated version! I really like it! It really illustrates
what I had in mind :) I also agree with you that the picture of the paper
is too complicated :)

I have just one comment:

I am not sure if "Access" is on the right place. Maybe, it should be
between "Web" and "External Use". In fact, I'm not sure if in our lifecycle
we should make a distinction between Data Publication and Access. The
authors from [1] make this difference, but in our case I am not sure if
this is necessary.

*Publication *concerns the moment when data is made accessible on the Web
and *Access* denotes the moment in the lifecycle when users gain access to
data available on the Web.

Do you think that there is a distinction between these two moments?

Thanks again!
Bernadette


2014-12-18 11:12 GMT-03:00 Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
:
>
> Hi Bernadette, all
>
> Le 15 déc. 2014 à 19:02, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> a
> écrit :
>
> I used the abstract lifecycle model proposed by [1] as the basis for our
> lifecycle, but I don't agree with the description of the Archiving phase.
> In my opinion, Archiving should be "the moment when data is removed from
> the Web" instead of Termination. Then, in this case, we won't have the
> Termination phase.
>
>
> Should we need to make such a complicated lifecycle? Or why authors of
> scientific papers like more complicated figures?
>
> Does it make sense for you?
>
>
> Based on your previous comments, I have an updated version, same URL:
> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/images/7/73/Lifecycle.pdf.
> At least, Christophe will be happy to see that I removed “terminator” ;-)
>
> HTH
> Ghislain
>
>

-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------