W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > August 2014

RE: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage

From: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 21:11:23 +0200
To: "'Lee, Deirdre'" <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>, "'Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group'" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <003901cfb017$e2c6a7c0$a853f740$@makxdekkers.com>
DataCite is indeed for research data but you could imagine similar schemes for other types of data. Not saying we should do this, just that I wondered whether R-Citable intended to be more than requiring that data gets a URI.

Makx.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lee, Deirdre [mailto:Deirdre.Lee@deri.org]
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 4:39 PM
> To: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group
> Subject: RE: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data
> Usage
> 
> Okay, could move R-Citable a general requirement
> Datacite looks great; does it only apply to research data, or could it
> apply to any data on the web?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
> [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org]
> Sent: 03 June 2014 23:51
> To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
> Subject: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data
> Usage
> 
> dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/40
> 
> Raised by: Makx Dekkers
> On product:
> 
> I don’t understand how R-Citable is a requirement for Data Usage. It’s
> much more general than that. And don’t URIs for data solve that
> requirement already? Or do you mean that something like DataCite
> https://www.datacite.org/ should be considered?
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 4 August 2014 19:11:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:24:16 UTC