W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dpub-aria@w3.org > October 2016

DPUB-ARIA exit criteria

From: Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken <tsiegman@wiley.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:55:38 +0000
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
CC: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, Matt Garrish <mgarrish@gmail.com>, "DPUB-ARIA (public-dpub-aria@w3.org)" <public-dpub-aria@w3.org>
Message-ID: <98715e25115342cb99111861b7b54f0d@AUS-WNMBP-005-n.wiley.com>
Hi All,

Following up on this email and today’s meeting:


1.       Ivan, would you please clarify if this was based on a discussion with Ralph? To confirm, Ralph was OK with publisher/author implementation of either the DPUB-ARIA roles or their predecessors in epub:type vocabulary?

2.       Shane, what do you need from DPUB to arrange formal testing procedures?

3.       We need to document our exit criteria for CR. Our plan is to publish in mid-November. Michael has asked us for this documentation by 4 Nov (ideally) (really no later than 8 Nov). I have not worked on this sort of thing before. I assume, Ivan and Shane that you are pros.   Happy to help out.

Tzviya

Tzviya Siegman
Information Standards Lead
Wiley
201-748-6884
tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>

From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 11:40 AM
To: Shane McCarron
Cc: Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken; Richard Schwerdtfeger; Michael Cooper
Subject: Re: chat with Ralph


On 29 Sep 2016, at 17:35, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io<mailto:shane@spec-ops.io>> wrote:

I assume you meant "However, for this case *if* we cannot do that…"

Oops, sorry…

(Never send a mail while on a call…:-)



I can imagine a really simple web service that you could submit content to that would look for role values and tabulate them.  Ask for a little information to correlate the usage with the "user" (publisher).  Map the results against the terms in the document.

If there is interest in that, I will have someone throw it together.  That's what Spec-Ops is here for!

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org<mailto:ivan@w3.org>> wrote:
I have chatted with him on the (vocabulary) exit criteria. Bottom line:

- Ideally, we should indeed have, for each term, at least two publishers/authors who use that term. Not necessarily in absolute full production, but at least, as a start, in some preliminary uses
- However, for this case, we cannot do that, we should have for each term, at least two publishers/authors that use the semantically equivalent epub:type value. Ie, if the only difference is syntax, then that should be fine.

Would that work?

Ivan


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153<tel:%2B31-641044153>
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704






--
Shane McCarron
Projects Manager, Spec-Ops


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2016 15:56:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 20 October 2016 15:56:13 UTC