Re: Outcomes of the XG

I agree to the outcomes.

Chamindra de Silva
http://chamindra.googlepages.com


Renato Iannella wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi all - the W3C Incubator groups have a life-span of one year. This may 
> sound like
> a long time, but in reality it goes very quickly in 'standards time'.
> 
> The most important aspects are the outcomes. As these are used to inform 
> and kick-start
> any new work as a (potential) fully fledged Working Group.
> 
> I would like to see 2 main deliverables:
> 
> 1 - A current state-of-the-art of vocabularies used in the 
> crisis/disaster/emergency/resilience sector.
> 2 - Towards an interoperability framework for the 
> crisis/disaster/emergency/resilience sector
> 
> The first deliverable gives a good idea of what is happening today, 
> which we can use in the second deliverable
> to setup the roadmap towards interoperability. The latter will also pose 
> the questions and drivers for future work.
> 
> As an example, the current W3C Multimedia Semantics Incubator Group [1] 
> is working on:
>  - Multimedia Semantics on the Web: Vocabularies [2]
>  - Multimedia Annotation Interoperability Framework [3]
> 
> I believe that we should set a realistic scope - driven by outcomes - 
> for the XG
> for this effort to deliver benefits to our community.
> 
> 
> Cheers...  Renato Iannella
> NICTA
> 
> 
> [1] <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/>
> [2] <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/wiki/Vocabularies>
> [3] <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/XGR-interoperability/>
> 
>