W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > November 2015

Re: FW: Proposal: remove aria-describedat from the ARIA 1.1 specification

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 06:55:10 -0600
Message-ID: <CAOk_reFgRdD38AiBPsfy=mEHmjM-mRnoppCjEcWp16UT71JdKw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Cc: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats" <public-pfwg@w3.org>, "public-digipub-ig@w3.org" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Sure.  A "main" role or a "doc-" role?  Since this is (actually) a
mainstream problem, a "main" role seems more sensible to me.  That and a
technique for guidance and call it a day?

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On 12 November 2015 at 11:48, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote:
>
>> It was proposed (during PF this week) that a simple ARIA role could
>> trigger notification for AT users, and could trigger CSS to show the non
>> AT user that a description is available.
>>
>
> sounds reasonable
>
> --
>
> Regards
>
> SteveF
> Current Standards Work @W3C
> <http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/>
>



-- 
Shane McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Thursday, 12 November 2015 12:55:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 25 April 2017 10:44:35 UTC