W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > September 2014

Re: [METADATA] Webbiness of publishing metadata (ISSUE-1)

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:23:31 +0200
Cc: Tzviya Siegman <tsiegman@wiley.com>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>, Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>, Madi Weland Solomon <madi.solomon@pearson.com>
Message-Id: <65B2C292-7B0F-425B-82F1-AA0EFB9ECE1C@w3.org>
To: Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>

On 15 Sep 2014, at 16:41 , Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com> wrote:

> does this issue relate to use of JSON (JSON-LD) to annotate with metadata, to enable processing of metadata by common web developers (with JSON-LD enabling intelligent processing) [ re-positioning Ivanís comment away from RDF explicitly)

Yeah... in practice, JSON-LD might be the right syntax indeed. But that is further down the line...

Ivan


> 
> regards, Frederick
> 
> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
> @fjhirsch
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 15, 2014, at 4:59 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Tzviya
>> 
>> I try to clarify the issues you raised...
>> 
>> the description of ISSUE-1[1] is currently empty. (It only has a title, in the subject of this mail).
>> 
>> My interpretation of your question: is the published metadata web-friendly? For me, with my W3C/OWP goggle on, this means whether it is easy to use and combine metadata around a (or a family of) publication. With my former Semantic Web hat's google on this time, this is very much related to the essence of RDF: forgetting about the arcane syntax of RDF/XML, the various choices that have been made in its design, the real advantage of RDF is the ability to combine (meta)data coming from different sources. And the core of this is: use URI-s as unique identifiers wherever it makes sense and is useful.
>> 
>> So... is the usage of URI-s around publishing metadata a solved issue? I have the *impression* the answer is no (but Laura D. may shoot me.) If not, is there anything W3C can do around this? Honestly, I do not think so, it may be just as a complex task as defining a unified vocabulary to rule them all... Is there a way to at least help? Years ago a document was produced in the semantic web domain called 'Cool URI-s for the Semantic Web'[2]; would it be of any help if we tried to do something similar?
>> 
>> But I may completely misunderstand the issue.
>> 
>> Ivan
>> 
>> P.S. That being said, I would think that this whole issue SHOULD be listed in the metadata document we produce, spelling it out clearly.
>> 
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/track/issues/1
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/
>> 
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C 
>> Digital Publishing Activity Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> GPG: 0x343F1A3D
>> WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C 
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
GPG: 0x343F1A3D
WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me






Received on Monday, 15 September 2014 16:24:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 25 April 2017 10:44:20 UTC