- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:21:39 +0200
- To: Romain Deltour <rdeltour@gmail.com>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Romain, Thank you very much for your input. I have added your spec suggestion to the table. Note that I linked to the latest draft publish in TR (instead of trhe editor's draft on github) when there was a TR draft. Best, Thierry. On 24/06/2014 10:08, Romain Deltour wrote: > I’m not a member of the DPUB IG but since you’re calling for a larger review here are a few comments: > > Almost all the specs from the Web Application WG are relevant IMO (if not for current EPUB 3.x, at least for the future of digital publishing). To name a few: > > - Manifest for web applications (WD) http://w3c.github.io/manifest/ > - Service Workers (WD) http://slightlyoff.github.io/ServiceWorker/spec/service_worker/ > - Custom Elements (WD) http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/custom/ > - HTML Imports (WD) http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/imports/ > - Shadow DOM (D) http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/shadow/ > > The table can also include Jeni Tennison’s TAG draft on packaging: > > - Packaging on the Web (ED) http://w3ctag.github.io/packaging-on-the-web/ > > The specs from the IndieUI WG may be more relevant to reading systems, but are important to adaptability and a11y: > > - User Context 1.0 (ED) https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndieUI/raw-file/default/src/indie-ui-context.html > - Events 1.0 (WD) http://www.w3.org/TR/indie-ui-events/ > > Note also that ARIA 1.1 is not in the table (ARIA 1.0 is), although it’s already referenced by EPUB 3.0.1 (notably for its aria-describedat attribute). > > > Hope this helps, > Romain. > > > -- > Romain Deltour, Software Developer > The DAISY Consortium > http://www.daisy.org > > > > On 24 juin 2014, at 08:33, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> A few months ago I had started an initial list of W3C specifications that are important for the Digital Publishing industry [1], as it is required in our interest Group Charter deliverables [1]. >> >> Thanks to them, a few participants of the DPUB IG have edited and update this table. >> >> I would like to request a review from a larger group of participants, to enrich this list with W3C technologies that you may be aware of and are missing in this table. >> >> Then we will have to prioritized this list, according to our charter. >> >> Thank you for your collaboration, >> >> Thierry Michel. >> >> >> [1] https://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/W3C_specs_for_DPUB >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2013/02/digpubig.html >> >> >> On 01/04/2014 15:13, Thierry MICHEL wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Per my action item, I have started a list of W3C specifications that are >>> important for the Digital Publishing industry. >>> >>> https://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/W3C_specs_for_DPUB >>> >>> this is only a start, therefore feel free to add/update this table with >>> new specs. >>> >>> If you have any issues regarding this task, let me know. >>> >>> Thierry. >> >
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2014 06:22:08 UTC