[Removing failed cross post attempt to device-dev@chromium.org] On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Vincent Scheib <scheib@google.com> wrote: > I think 60 (practically 45) minutes is reasonable start. I've added my > suggestion to https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC/2017/SessionIdeas#Device_API > s_session and welcome any & all modifications folks may have. If we > identify follow up conversations Wednesday we'll have the ability to find > time on the following days. > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Kostiainen, Anssi < > anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote: > >> Hi Vincent, >> >> > On 8 Sep 2017, at 20.47, Vincent Scheib <scheib@google.com> wrote: >> > >> > I'm unfamiliar with how TPAC plenary days typically play out. Is there >> a reason Wednesday is a bad fit for an hour breakout session? >> >> If one hour is enough, then Wednesday would be fine. >> >> (In practice it's more like 45 minutes, since some time is needed for >> folks to move to the next session.) >> >> > Thursday has other working group meetings, so e.g. I will be there then >> but need to manage conflicts. >> >> Thursday and Friday 15:00 onwards there's time for ad-hoc meetings, so we >> could utilise that time too to avoid some overlaps: >> >> https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC/2017/ad-hoc-meetings >> >> (Some WGs try to close early on Thu/Fri to facilitate ad-hoc meeting >> participation.) >> >> Would either of those slots work for you Vincent? >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Anssi >> >> >
Received on Monday, 11 September 2017 20:02:29 UTC