W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Please confirm DAP comment resolution

From: Anssi Kostiainen <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:14:12 +0200
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "public-device-apis public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5807F066-3B6B-40A1-928F-0FDE800C1606@nokia.com>
To: ext Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Doug Turner <dougt@mozilla.com>
[+ Doug]

Hi Anne,

On 19.1.2013, at 11.28, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:27 PM,  <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote:
>> (1b) LC-2731 [2] ; re-order requirement for queuing and firing (I did not see other specific issues in published draft noted in the email, e.g. RFC terms in Notes or duplicate definitions)
> 
> Duplicate definitions is still there and is still as confusing as
> before. E.g. 5.2.1 lists attributes but 5.2.2 defines them. 5.2.2 also
> lists dictionary members while it is customary for EventInit derived
> dictionaries to not be listed as such at all, they only need to be in
> the IDL fragment.

I sent a pull request to fix this issue in ReSpec. The specs I edit should update themselves automagically when a new version of ReSpec is released assuming my patch is accepted.

>> (2b) LC-2737 [4] , re-order requirement for queuing and firing (I did not see other specific issues in published draft noted in the email, e.g. RFC terms in Notes or duplicate definitions)
> 
> The same problem exists in this specification.

This will fix itself too.

> In addition, "the Window object" should probably be something else.
> There can be a whole lot of Window objects.


"... at the browsing context's Window object" is how it's implemented in Gecko, IIUC:

  https://bug738131.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=612652

Doug - is that correct?

-Anssi
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2013 14:15:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:57 UTC