W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > September 2012

RE: Proposal to change HTML Media Capture to address issue LC-2644

From: NN Murthy <nn.murthy@cmcltd.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:37:40 +0530
To: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001401cd96e5$7a73f7b0$6f5be710$@murthy@cmcltd.com>
This change is acceptable.

-----Original Message-----
From: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com [mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com] 
Sent: 20 September 2012 00:46
To: public-device-apis@w3.org; nn.murthy@cmcltd.com
Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
Subject: Proposal to change HTML Media Capture to address issue LC-2644

N N Murthy

Regarding issue LC-2644, "support different image producing devices" [1],
the DAP WG discussed the issue on today's teleconference [2].

We believe this can be resolved by understanding that a camera, scanner etc
are all "still image capture" devices.

Concretely, I believe we can resolve this issue by making the following
change to section 5.1, "Attributes", of the HTML Media Capture draft [3]:

In the table cell for keyword 'camera' and capture control type, change "A
camera" to "A still image capture device".

Does this resolve the issue for you? Members of the WG, does this change
capture the discussion today?

Please +1 on the list if this change is acceptable.

Thanks

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
Chair, W3C DAP Working Group

[1]
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/43696/WD-html-media-capture-2
0120712/2644

[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2012Sep/att-0096/minu
tes-2012-09-19.html#item05

[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-html-media-capture-20120712/#attributes

Message subject changed for clarity.

For tracker, should close ACTION-577



On Sep 17, 2012, at 5:34 AM, ext NN Murthy wrote:

> Thank you very much for your response. I do not have any additional
inputs. However it is a fact that document scanner is the most popular image
input device to input variety of documents on desk top systems. Cameras may
be popular on mobile devices but I hope that the focus of this group is to
address web in larger context rather than focussed on mobile devices.
> Similarly the low cost biometric input devices are for personal
identifications but there are many important biometric applications that use
more expensive devices, be it law enforcement, be it other e-governance
applications such as border control, access control etc. This group will
help the larger class of applications by addressing these requirements.
> The example I have given for web services for live scan devices is an
example of interest in biometric applications on use of web technologies.
However what this group trying to do is better solution compared to web
services. Hence my request. 
> If document scanners and live scanners declaring themselves as cameras is
a viable technical solution, it is fine.
> Regards,
> N N Murthy

______________________________________________________________________________

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may
contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying
of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it
are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us by reply e-mail or directly to netsupport@cmcltd.com or
telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any
attachments. Thank you.

______________________________________________________________________________

This email has been scrubbed for your protection by SecureMX.
For more information visit http://securemx.in
_____________________________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2012 04:08:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2012 04:08:14 GMT