W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Half a Review: Proximity Events - W3C Editor's Draft 16 May 2012

From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 11:13:14 +0100
To: Anssi Kostiainen <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com>
Cc: "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <27101CAF57B046AAB8CCFFAA517BD25E@marcosc.com>



On Monday, 28 May 2012 at 08:58, Anssi Kostiainen wrote:

> Hi Marcos,
> 
> Thanks for the feedback!
np.  
> 
> On 25.5.2012, at 17.11, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
> > How about: 
> > Because most proximity sensors detect electromagnetic radiation (e.g., an infrared light or a magnetic field), certain material properties can interfere with the sensor's ability to sense the presence of a physical object. Things that can interfere with a sensor include, but are not limited to, the material's translucency, reflectiveness, color, temperature, chemical composition, and even the angle at which the object is reflecting the radiation back at the sensor. As such, proximity sensors should not be relied on as a means to measure distance: the only thing that can be deduced from a proximity sensor is that an object is somewhere in the distance between the minimum device proximity and the maximum device proximity with some degree of certainty."
> 
> 
> Added to introduction.
> 


just two tiny nits above, please change:

"minimum device proximity and the maximum device proximity" 
to:
"minimum sensing distance and the maximum sensing distance". 



-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Monday, 28 May 2012 10:13:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 28 May 2012 10:14:00 GMT