W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > May 2012

[proximity] The initial state of the proximity sensor (was: Tests and ref imp)

From: Anssi Kostiainen <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 10:34:33 +0300
Cc: "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1BC5E09D-6C70-4133-8FD8-E0D3892D89DE@nokia.com>
To: ext Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>

On 23.5.2012, at 2.18, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:

> Having said that, not having the initial state of the proximity sensor is an issue (and should probably be marked as such in the spec).

By initial state, do you refer to the discussion we had around the alternative sync API proposal (navigator.proximitystate) that addressed this concern but was cumbersome to implement? Here's the old proposal:


(To make sure on-one gets confused, I'll have to mention the above draft is an old one despite ReSpec.js showing the current date.)

Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 07:35:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:54 UTC