W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > January 2012

Re: Battery API Last Call Comment Status

From: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:27:05 +0100
Message-ID: <4F194179.4070505@lamouri.fr>
To: public-device-apis@w3.org
On 01/19/2012 10:17 PM, Carr, Wayne wrote:
> We can close the request to determine if a battery is present.  It would be nice and I think fairly irrelevant for fingerprinting.   The important one was the other comment that was fixed.

Why would that be nice?

> Different topic, but one thing to consider is including a sentence that says the api provides summary information across one or more batteries (since there can be more than one).  Maybe that's obvious and doesn't need to be said.

What's the use case for that? Implementations could easily handle 
multiple batteries. For example, battery.level would take into account 
that there are more than one battery and will show the combined 
batteries level.

Received on Friday, 20 January 2012 10:27:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:52 UTC