W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > January 2012

Re: Battery API Last Call Comment Status

From: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:50:54 +0100
Message-ID: <4F15FB4E.4000704@lamouri.fr>
To: public-device-apis@w3.org
On 01/17/2012 10:48 PM, Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com wrote:
> (4) LC-2577 (Proposal needed), no way to distinguish whether battery present, Wayne
> Discussion died down on task force list after general agreement that fingerprinting not an issue
> * Is this still an issue? If so, concrete proposal needed

I don't think this is an issue: there is no major need to check if the 
device actually has a battery or not.

In addition, fingerprinting *is* an issue. Indeed, we shouldn't block 
everything because of fingerprinting: for example, the level attribute 
and the charging attribute is helping to track users but it's much more 
useful than hurtful. However, knowing if there is actually a battery 
seems only useful in the case of a battery UI which is a very specific 
use case. We can handle that in another version of the specification or 
in another specification (like some Device Capabilities API).

Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2012 22:51:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:52 UTC