W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > February 2012

Re: drafting March f2f agenda

From: Josh Soref <jsoref@rim.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:39:49 +0000
To: "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <957F1ECDA90E004B8DBDE23CFC94E3A332137CCC@XMB103ECNC.rim.net>
I'd like to add NFC to the Agenda. 

It has come up a lot this month. 

For the record, I think that DAP and Cryptography* are the two WGs whose charters' fit the area. DAP through Intents may be the primary vehicle for this. I think there may be a need for a sealed environment (the NetFlix UC for Cryptography includes this). That environment may be a crossover to WebApps and HTML.  

* Cryptography isn't done chartering. 

----- Original Message -----
From: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com [mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 05:16 PM
To: public-device-apis@w3.org <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Subject: drafting March f2f agenda

I have created a rough draft for an agenda for the F2F 20-22 March to help us review and create an agenda, see http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/F2F_Agenda_20-22_March_2012,_Shenzhen,_China

http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/F2F_Agenda_20-22_March_2012,_Shenzhen,_China#Day_3.2C_Thursday_22_March_2012_.289_am_-_4_pm.29

Some thoughts:

1) WebIntents on Day 1 reflects our general agreement to review and progress WebIntents on day !. I also think it would be useful to review how we intend to progress Contacts given our understanding of WebIntents. We probably should also review and plan to document privacy/security of device APIs in the context of WebIntents.

2) I suggest the WG as a whole should understand the status of the Media Capture task force, perhaps a member of that task force can volunteer to lead a session to review and discuss that work. This can help socialize the work and also encourage additional participation and feedback to the TF.

3) We probably should consider how to move Battery and Vibration to CR, this might happen on a teleconference before the F2F (after 1 March for Vibration), but maybe it is an appropriate decision for the F2F.

4) Although work on  test cases and interop can happen out of the main WG calls, maybe we can start work on this at the F2F, raising any issues we might have.

Timings and topics are all a rough take, just to get us started. If you plan to call in, you should indicate if a topic you can contribute to should be moved in the schedule. I'm not sure we can juggle everything to everyone's satisfaction, but we can try. We also need to get a clear understanding of who plans to attend in person, and who plans to call in, including those working on WebIntents that are not in DAP.

I tentatively put 9-5 for day 1, 2 and 9-4 for day 3, but we should discuss.

Do you see any missing topics?

thanks

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
Co-Chair, W3C DAP Working Group






---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 12:40:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:14:28 GMT