W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > February 2012

RE: drafting March f2f agenda

From: Nilsson, Claes1 <Claes1.Nilsson@sonyericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:58:03 +0100
To: "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>, "public-web-intents@w3.org" <public-web-intents@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6DFA1B20D858A14488A66D6EEDF26AA35D64D523CA@seldmbx03.corpusers.net>
Hi Frederick,

I would like to include a discussion on Web Intents in the context of local services according to the discussion on the mailing list and proposals on the wiki: http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebIntents/Home_Discovery_and_Web_Intents

Furthermore, the discussion on a simplified approach to Web Intents needs to addressed at the meeting. So, I am considering if just one day is enough for Web Intents. Continuing with Web Intents in the morning of day 2 might be needed (under the assumption that interested people will stay).

Regards
  Claes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com [mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com]
> Sent: den 14 februari 2012 23:16
> To: public-device-apis@w3.org
> Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
> Subject: drafting March f2f agenda
> 
> I have created a rough draft for an agenda for the F2F 20-22 March to
> help us review and create an agenda, see
> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/F2F_Agenda_20-
> 22_March_2012,_Shenzhen,_China
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/F2F_Agenda_20-
> 22_March_2012,_Shenzhen,_China#Day_3.2C_Thursday_22_March_2012_.289_am_
> -_4_pm.29
> 
> Some thoughts:
> 
> 1) WebIntents on Day 1 reflects our general agreement to review and
> progress WebIntents on day !. I also think it would be useful to review
> how we intend to progress Contacts given our understanding of
> WebIntents. We probably should also review and plan to document
> privacy/security of device APIs in the context of WebIntents.
> 
> 2) I suggest the WG as a whole should understand the status of the
> Media Capture task force, perhaps a member of that task force can
> volunteer to lead a session to review and discuss that work. This can
> help socialize the work and also encourage additional participation and
> feedback to the TF.
> 
> 3) We probably should consider how to move Battery and Vibration to CR,
> this might happen on a teleconference before the F2F (after 1 March for
> Vibration), but maybe it is an appropriate decision for the F2F.
> 
> 4) Although work on  test cases and interop can happen out of the main
> WG calls, maybe we can start work on this at the F2F, raising any
> issues we might have.
> 
> Timings and topics are all a rough take, just to get us started. If you
> plan to call in, you should indicate if a topic you can contribute to
> should be moved in the schedule. I'm not sure we can juggle everything
> to everyone's satisfaction, but we can try. We also need to get a clear
> understanding of who plans to attend in person, and who plans to call
> in, including those working on WebIntents that are not in DAP.
> 
> I tentatively put 9-5 for day 1, 2 and 9-4 for day 3, but we should
> discuss.
> 
> Do you see any missing topics?
> 
> thanks
> 
> regards, Frederick
> 
> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
> Co-Chair, W3C DAP Working Group
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 13:58:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:14:28 GMT