W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Contacts API: remaining edits

From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:16:54 +0200
Cc: public-device-apis@w3.org
Message-Id: <4191C1F6-907B-4EEE-9FB7-C48D2EBADB02@berjon.com>
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Hi,

I've made all the changes (that Dom hadn't already made) and filed the document for Last Call publication tomorrow. The one thing that is slightly different from what was agreed upon (but for which I made a judgement call that I think is correct is the following):

On Jun 15, 2011, at 15:52 , Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> * my comment on the fact that the API refers to revokable permissions
> when it's not clear that we're using a permission model in the spec
> still stands; likewise regarding the existing of PERMISSION_DENIED_ERROR
> error code;

Using a permission model is possible with the spec  in fact we don't enforce it either way and it is quite possible that implementers will chose that option (the alternatives we propose are not normative). As a result it's quite possible that permissions could be granted in a manner that requires them being revoked, and that there could indeed be a PERMISSION_DENIED_ERROR. If eventually everyone implements it in the manner indicated in the appendix, we can phase these out. Is that an issue?

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Wednesday, 15 June 2011 15:17:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:14:21 GMT