W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > May 2010

Re: Core Device Interfaces?

From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 15:39:00 +0200
Cc: public-device-apis <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C0EE988E-A45D-459A-BDF5-8B9791EF9D21@berjon.com>
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
On May 26, 2010, at 14:49 , Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> Are we still planning to keep "Core Device Interfaces" [1] around? Given
> that we seem to have agreed not to agree on a single host object for the
> various API entry points, its sole value would be in the definition of
> PendingOp, which looks a fairly limited win.
> 
> If we do want to keep it around, we probably ought to get it out as
> FPWD, at least to accompany the last call of SysInfo.

I can live with either, and update it accordingly. Defining PendingOp isn't much, but it might be better than nothing? We can get it out as a FPWD fairly easily.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2010 13:39:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:43 UTC