W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > January 2010

"encrypted" attribute (Re: CfC: Publishing System Information API FPWD)

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:04:17 +0100
Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, public-device-apis@w3.org
Message-Id: <3E2D8B11-893B-4FD4-B504-519BEA7CA893@w3.org>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>, Max Froumentin <maxfro@opera.com>
Is there a reason why we can't dispose of the "encrypted" attribute on Network before publication? (See ISSUE-63.)  In its current form, this attribute is harmful.

Thanks,
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>







On 21 Jan 2010, at 18:48, Robin Berjon wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> this is a Call for Consensus to publish a FPWD of the System Information API (http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/system-info/).
> 
> Please review the current draft which Max updated earlier today, and make the comments you believe you need to make before next week's call, at which point we'll make the decision to publish or not. 
> 
> Note that there is no requirement on FPWDs to be perfect  if they were perfect we'd go straight to LC. They need to be good for broader review, and reasonably feature-complete.
> 
> Where CfCs are concerned, silence is considered to be assent, but positive support is preferred (even if simply with a +1).
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> --
> Robin Berjon
> robineko  hired gun, higher standards
> http://robineko.com/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2010 18:04:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:14:05 GMT