- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:04:17 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>, Max Froumentin <maxfro@opera.com>
- Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, public-device-apis@w3.org
Is there a reason why we can't dispose of the "encrypted" attribute on Network before publication? (See ISSUE-63.) In its current form, this attribute is harmful. Thanks, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> On 21 Jan 2010, at 18:48, Robin Berjon wrote: > Hi all, > > this is a Call for Consensus to publish a FPWD of the System Information API (http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/system-info/). > > Please review the current draft which Max updated earlier today, and make the comments you believe you need to make before next week's call, at which point we'll make the decision to publish or not. > > Note that there is no requirement on FPWDs to be perfect — if they were perfect we'd go straight to LC. They need to be good for broader review, and reasonably feature-complete. > > Where CfCs are concerned, silence is considered to be assent, but positive support is preferred (even if simply with a +1). > > Thanks! > > -- > Robin Berjon > robineko — hired gun, higher standards > http://robineko.com/ > > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2010 18:04:22 UTC