- From: Max Froumentin <maxfro@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:19:07 +0100
- To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- CC: "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
On 05/01/2010 17:53, Thomas Roessler wrote: > The camera API looks like it's focused on a really cheap camera. I > wonder whether we want to go down the route of describing things > like > > - aperture - shutter - sensor dimension (both physical and pixel) - > ISO speed - focal length - camera orientation - flash on or off for > the next capture? Fair enough. After the discussion at [1] I didn't think much more about what to put in there, and what to leave to the Capture API. The current list (supportsVideo, hasFlash, sensorPixels, maxZoomFactor) contains properties which are fixed, while I think that variable attributes (zoom, aperture, ISO, etc.) should go to Capture. But it's a very fine line, and the question is noted in an issue in the draft, awaiting proposals. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2009Dec/0192.html Max.
Received on Wednesday, 6 January 2010 11:19:41 UTC