W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > December 2010

Re: Contacts API

From: Rich Tibbett <rich.tibbett@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:04:32 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTinOHWoVevw98upVOWOQnfB6evycfAnwL1=sK8qa@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Hunt <huntc@internode.on.net>
Cc: public-device-apis@w3.org
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Christopher Hunt

> Hi there,

> I just noticed something about the proposed Contacts API (1). With regards
> to time zones, the current GMT offset is being provided. While I think that
> can be of use, I think that it would be of better to supply the time zone in
> Zoneinfo format (2). Zoneinfo is pretty much used by most Unix systems and
> should be supportable by Browsers across all platforms IMHO.
>  Perhaps even consider a Timezone object for Javascript based on the ICU
> implementation (3).

>  Having time zone information available means that UTC offsets can be
> calculated given any date/time.

We have identified this as a problem, especially wrt use within our proposed
Calendar API. As such we are also developing a TimezonedDate object (though
it's due for an update to be called TZDate) that accounts for timezone
identifiers within Date objects:


I think this may cover your concerns. It's probably fair to say that the
ECMA TC-39 Date object is limited in its usefulness at the moment. It would
be much better if ECMA TC039 created a Calendar object based on the same
structured used for the standard Java Calendar object:

Having said that, it may not be such a critical issue within Contacts. Only
the birthday and revision attributes use a Date object and the usage and
storage of those attributes could be clarified IMO to factor out any
timezone ambiguity (birthday should not include any time information,
revision should be always be stored as a UTC value). However, when we start
to deal with Calendaring events that can recur indefinitely and allow
sharing those events between users across timezones this becomes critical.

> Other than that though, this seems like a great initiative.

Thanks for the feedback.

If you have any further thoughts or proposals for handling timezone
identifiers then please let us know.

- Rich

> Kind regards,
> Christopher Hunt
> (1) http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-contacts-api-20101209/
> (2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tz_database
> (3) http://userguide.icu-project.org/datetime/timezone
Received on Friday, 10 December 2010 12:05:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:47 UTC