W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > December 2009

RE: <device> proposal (for video conferencing, etc)

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:13:17 +0000 (UTC)
To: "Tran, Dzung D" <dzung.d.tran@intel.com>
Cc: "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0912170509550.15825@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Tran, Dzung D wrote:
> >> How do you envision your work integrate with Device API WG's current 
> >> spec? Is there some hand off between your <device> selector and 
> >> Device API? Or not?
> >
> > Which spec did you have in mind?
> 
> I was thinking of the current work with the Capture APIs as: 
> http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/camera/

Oh I assumed that this API was for the widget case -- in HTML4, you can 
already do static image capture and non-streaming video or audio capture, 
using <image type=file accept=...>. It's not widely supported yet, but 
HTML5 elaborated a little on the idea and from talking with browser 
vendors I wouldn't be surprised to see it implemented in the near future.


> I think in one of the example from Andrei Popescu you could handle the 
> non-streaming capture as:
> 
> <device type="mediaFile" onchange="update(this.data)">
> 
> function update(file) {  // file is an object that implements interface File
> }

This seems redundant with existing features. I'd be very reluctant to 
introduce multiple ways to do things.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 17 December 2009 05:13:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:14:03 GMT