W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > December 2009

Re: Comparing capture* API vs <input type="file" accept="...">

From: Arve Bersvendsen <arveb@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:52:52 +0100
To: "Frederick Hirsch" <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, "Oksanen Ilkka" <Ilkka.Oksanen@nokia.com> (Nokia-D/Espoo)
Cc: "ext Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>, public-device-apis <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.u4ff2cc9byn2jm@galactica>
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:44:18 +0100, Frederick Hirsch  
<frederick.hirsch@nokia.com> wrote:

> I do not want to make this complicated, but am still trying to  
> understand the use case. What about a webcam (nanny cam, whatever) type  
> device, would that qualify as use case  needing programmatic non-user  
> interaction control?

A web cam/nanny cam would typically not have any user interface at all,  
except one it exposes over the network, through an embedded web or media  
server of some kind   In that case, you'd have a single application on the  
device.

-- 
Arve Bersvendsen

Opera Software ASA, http://www.opera.com/
Received on Friday, 4 December 2009 18:53:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:14:02 GMT