- From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 17:04:18 -0500
- To: Oksanen Ilkka (Nokia-D/Espoo) <Ilkka.Oksanen@nokia.com>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, ext Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>, "Tran, Dzung D" <dzung.d.tran@intel.com>, public-device-apis <public-device-apis@w3.org>, "'Ingmar.Kliche@telekom.de'" <Ingmar.Kliche@telekom.de>
Aren't setting white balance and resolution pretty basic to meaningful photography? regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Dec 2, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Oksanen Ilkka (Nokia-D/Espoo) wrote: > ext Robin Berjon wrote: >> On Dec 2, 2009, at 11:27 , Ilkka Oksanen wrote: >>> One clear missing feature is setting of preferred settings, >>> especially preferred image/video resolution. Currently it's >>> possible get the supported camera resolutions but not select which >>> of them is preferred when images or videos are captured. If >>> possible this is something I would like enhance still during this >>> week. >> >> In general, how strongly do you feel that this is a required feature >> for v1? I certainly agree that it's useful, but off the top of my >> head the most useful use cases don't strictly require it (and since >> the size is returned, it can be enforced in script). >> > > For me it's difficult to imagine a realistic use case where just > getting > a list of supported resolutions and formats is enough while setting > the > preferred resolution and format is not possible. That is what the > draft > allows currently. > > Therefore I believe there are two options. Either remove > supportedImageFormats, supportedVideoFormats and supportedAudioFormats > variables from the API or complement those with ability to set the > preferences based on values of these variables. If the second option > affects to overall schedule of our v1 work then I'm ready to consider > resorting to the first option. > > -ilkka > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 3 December 2009 22:05:04 UTC