Le mardi 01 décembre 2009 à 14:26 +0100, Robin Berjon a écrit : > To clarify my intent, what I'm interested in finding is the smallest > set that is implementable everywhere *today* and *without > optionality*. I see value in that approach, but I think it’s worth noting that as soon as we go for the lowest common denominator, we drop the use cases of making a Web app your addressbooks manager since the said Web app wouldn’t be able to see (let alone edit) values that are outside of the LCD. I personally think that leaving that use case for v2 is fine. (a similar discussion is likely to arise for the Calendar API — I think we’ll need to be much more careful for that one) DomReceived on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 13:37:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:14:02 GMT