W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ddwg-comments@w3.org > April 2008

[LC-1969] RE: Core Vocabulary & DDR Simple API : Extensibility of vocabularies : Enumerations

From: Rotan Hanrahan <rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:12:42 -0400
Message-ID: <D5306DC72D165F488F56A9E43F2045D3018B12CD@FTO.mobileaware.com>
To: "JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA" <jmcf@tid.es>
Cc: <public-ddwg-comments@w3.org>
Hello José,

 

Thank you for your comment. We have recorded this as 'LC-1969' and will reply to you as soon as possible.

 

On behalf of DDWG,

Rotan Hanrahan,

Chair.

 

From: public-ddwg-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ddwg-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA
Sent: 15 April 2008 15:55
To: public-ddwg-comments@w3.org
Subject: Core Vocabulary & DDR Simple API : Extensibility of vocabularies : Enumerations

 

If an implementation decides to add an additional value to an enumerated property, such as supportedImageFormats, that new value will be in the same namespace as the Core Voc or in another namespace? 

 

How a call from the API will note this fact, as the set of values in an enumeration are represented as non-namespaced Strings?

 

How collisions between values are going to be avoided? 

Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2008 18:32:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:41:40 UTC